If WHO’s plan is
approved, this one of the factors that would affect the tobacco market is the
number of suppliers of tobacco will decreased. In the supply and demand graph
of the tobacco market, the decrease of number of tobacco suppliers will cause
the supply to decrease thus causing the supply curve to shift to the left. When
all the factors of production are ceteris paribus except the price, there would
be a movement along the curve. If there is an increase in quantity supplied,
the price would be increased. However, the market equilibrium in the tobacco
market would change due to the shifting to the left.
Figure 1.1 |
Based on the figure
1.1 of the tobacco market in Malaysia, we are able to observe that when there
is a decrease in supply the supply graph would shift to the left. The shifting
to left of the supply would cause a shortage in the original price, consumers
and suppliers would then negotiate again until they reach market equilibrium.
What will be affected is the market equilibrium price. The equilibrium price of
tobacco will increase to RM2.5 per tobacco from RM1.5 per tobacco and the
equilibrium quantity of tobacco will decrease from 10 million quantity of
tobacco to 5 million quantity of tobacco.
When resources are not used efficiently, there
would be a market failure in the tobacco market. The labors in the tobacco
market in Kelantan are worried about their future and some even went to protest
against World Health Organization. Labors who went to protest against WHO would
cause an inefficiency to produce tobacco because they are absent for work and
the maximum production would be affected, this is known as underproduction of
tobacco. A market failure would then cause the government to step in
to the situation to solve the problem.
But what will the
government do in order to solve this? The government would set up a price
ceiling which is to regulate the price and quantity of the tobacco market.
Figure 1.2 |
As seen in
figure 1.2 of the tobacco market in Malaysia, a price ceiling prevents the
suppliers to charge consumer at the price higher than a specific level set by
the government, which is the area above the price ceiling. The government puts
the price ceiling below the equilibrium price of tobacco, because it will have
a powerful effect as it forces the supplier to set its price at a lower level
so that consumers are able to enjoy the goods. Therefore, suppliers are not
able to charge the consumers at RM1.50 when the quantity supplied and demanded
is 10 million of tobacco per week. They are only able sell at RM1.00 when
quantity supplied is 5 million of tobacco per week.
When the price
ceiling is imposed, a shortage would actually arise in the market of tobacco
because suppliers of tobacco are not willing to sell when the price is too low
and consumers are willing to buy more when the current price for tobacco is
low.
Figure 1.3 |
Based on figure
1.3, price ceiling would actually encourage the existence of a black market.
Black market is illegal and it works along with the legal market when
governments impose a price ceiling. Due to the shortage, tobacco consumers
would be very desperate and are even willing to pay a higher price in order to
get the product as seen in Figure 1.3 where the maximum black market price per
tobacco is RM 2.20. This would then further encourage the arising of a black
market because suppliers are able to earn more.
However, when
the law in Malaysia is enforced by the authorities, the appearance of a black
market would actually be at a very low rate. When the authorities start to arrest
people who deal in the black market, people would be afraid to be involved in
the black market. Besides, the loyalty of the people towards the country can
also affect the black market. When the people in the country are against the
black market and obey the law of the country, the likelihood of a black market
to arise is very low.
Some consumers
would actually search for other alternatives of tobacco instead of wasting
their time on search activity. They know with the shortage around, it is hard
to look for tobacco and suppliers would to tend charge a higher price and try
to cheat their money. Therefore, instead of wasting time, they would turn to
the closest substitute of tobacco which is cheaper. This causes the demand
curve to shift to the left due to the substitution effect.
Figure 1.1 |
Figure 1.4 |
In figure 1.1, the supply curve
shift to the left due to the decrease in supplier, after the shortage arises.it
caused the black market to arise. Consumer starts to look for alternatives
because of the shortage, therefore in figure 1.4 the demand curve shifts to the
left due to the substitution effect.
When both the demand and supply of
curve of tobacco shifts to the left, the equilibrium quantity would decrease.
However the tobacco’s change in equilibrium price is left uncertain because
when there is decrease in demand lowers the equilibrium price of tobacco and
the decrease in supply raises the equilibrium price of tobacco in the tobacco
market. Consumers and suppliers would then start negotiating until both parties
agrees to the price, which means opposing forces balance each other.
However at the end of the day, it
all depends on whether WHO’s decision would be approved which would affect the
tobacco growers and curer. If it does, then this would be the consequences of
their action and the effects on the suppliers and consumers of the tobacco market.
Lets hope WHO would not make that decision that would cause the tobacco market to fall. besides I pity those people who would lose their job but Very interesting article. I enjoyed reading it. Keep up the good work!
ReplyDeleteI got to agree with you on what would happen in the future. There would definitely be a downfall in the tobacco market and suppliers who have tobacco supplies would take advantage if WHO decides to go on with its decision
ReplyDeleteVery detailed! I like how you show readers with the graphs and explanation on how it would affect the market. Good work mate! Would be looking forward to see more articles
ReplyDeleteThe Black Market is just bad for people. I just don't like the fact that suppliers take the opportunity to charge consumers at a higher price. But there's nothing much we could do to stop them from buying since they are desperate to get that particular product
ReplyDeleteNice touch on the black market! Desperate consumers of tobacco wouldn't mind paying extra just to satisfy their needs.
ReplyDeleteSometimes I think it would be better if there is no price ceiling on certain goods. Because I find that it would actually deal more harm than benefit to the consumers.
ReplyDeleteHi readers! thanks for all the encouragement and opinions. Would definitely do my best and analyze better!
ReplyDeleteI just want to pray that the tobacco are able to keep their jobs. It's pretty bad if WHO's decides to go with their decision.
ReplyDeleteThe authority should make a move to stop people from who are invovled in the black market. The law should be trifled with.
ReplyDeleteTobacco is not really healthy for consumers! But still, if all the suppliers have no tobacco to supply. Things would get really bad.
ReplyDeleteHow to make money off of playing slots or gambling
ReplyDeleteIn the online casino, you can earn money through 바카라사이트 playing online 카지노사이트 slot games. For example, a jackpot งานออนไลน์ slot machine offers to get up to 500,000 times its